CO2 TAX CON

Saturday, February 6, 2010

A United Nations report wrongly claimed that more than half of the Netherlands is currently below sea level.

In fact, just 20 percent of the country consists of polders that are pumped dry, and which are at risk of flooding if global warming causes rising sea levels. Dutch Environment Minister Jacqueline Cramer has ordered a thorough investigation into the quality of the climate reports which she uses to base her policies on.

Climate-sceptic MPs were quick to react. Conservative MP Helma Neppérus and Richard de Mos from the right-wing Freedom Party want the minister to explain to parliament how these figures were used to decide on national climate policy. "This may invalidate all claims that the last decades were the hottest ever," Mr De Mos said.
The incorrect figures which date back to 2007 were revealed on Wednesday by the weekly Vrij Nederland. The Dutch Environmental Assessment Agency told reporters that the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) added together two figures supplied by the agency: the area of the Netherlands which is below sea-level and the area which is susceptible to flooding. In fact, these areas overlap, so the figures should not have been combined to produce the 55 percent quoted by the IPCC.
The discovery comes just a week after a prediction about glaciers in the Himalayas proved wrong. Rather than disappearing by 2035, as IPCC reports claim, the original research underlying the report predicted the mountain ice would last until 2350.

http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/sea-level-blunder-enrages-dutch-minister

No comments:

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

"I am a Skeptic...Global warming has become a new religion."

-Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.

"Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly....as a scientist I remain skeptical."

- Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called "among the most preeminent scientist of the last 100 years."

"Warning fears are the "worst scientific scandal in history...When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists."

- UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award- winning PhD environmental physical chemist.

"The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn't listen to others.It doesn't have open minds....I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,"

- Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.

"The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity."

- Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico.

"It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don't buy into anthropogenic global warming."

- U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.

"Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will."

- Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

"After reading (UN IPCC chairman) Pachauri's asinine comment (comparing skeptics to) Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet."

- Climate statistician Dr. William m. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistic Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.

"For how many years must the Planet cool before we begin to understand that the Planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?"

- Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at uppsala University in Sweeden.

"Gore Prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp...Climate models can be useful for explaining climate change after the fact."

- Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a fomer member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.

"Many scientists are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting fears), without having their professional careers ruined."

- Atmospheric Physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.

"Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense...the present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major business and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning."

- Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

"Co2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another....Every scientist knows this, but it doesn't pay to say so...Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver's seat and developing nations walking barefoot."

- Dr. takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.

"The (Global Warming) scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds."

- Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata.